Extraordinary Meeting of Bridging Education and Supported Learning PAQC

From 2.00pm to 3.30pm; Thursday, 10 September 2020
170-1032
Chair:  Clare Goodwin
Secretary: Fiona Riches

Meeting resources

• Programme Academic Quality Committee Terms of Reference
• Kaupapa | Standing Orders
• Tikanga | Processes & Guidelines
• PAQC Information Sheet
• Committee OneDrive Link

• Rating Rubric
• Focus of PEP

1. Whakatuwheratanga | Opening

1.1 Karakia

1.2 Mihi Whakatau | Welcome

1. [Welcome notes from the Chair]

1.3 Ngā Whakapāha | Apologies

That the committee accepts apologies from the following members and acknowledges their nominated proxy in attendance.

1. 2020 BESL Attendance Tracker

2. Mea Hei Kōrero | Items To Discuss

2.1 2020 Interim PEPs

2.1.1 NZC Skills for Living and Working (Level 1)

2020 Interim PEP NZCSL

ACHIEVEMENT

What area(s) does the programme need to focus on improving in order to improve student achievement in the second half of 2020?

That the PAQC has confidence through its analysis of the PEP that the educational performance ratings given for each focus area (Select one of the following):

• are accurate
• shall be amended for the following focus areas before submission
• required more analysis and are to be reworked for reconsideration

SMART GOALS

What progress does this PEP evidence toward the completion of SMART goals set in the previous PEP? What reasons are known for any delays? Any suggested refinements to the SMART goals for the next period going forward

Progress on previous goals

That the PAQC can confirm that its oversight of the action plans since the last PEP have sighted regular activity toward completion and/or delays where necessary and these (Select one):

• are accurate
• shall be amended as follows before submission
• required more analysis and are to be reworked for reconsideration by the PACQ Chair before submission

New goals set

That the PAQC has reviewed the new SMART goals for this PEP and confirms (Select one):

• they are SMART and will be moved into the global workplan of the PAQC
• shall be amended as follows before moving into the global workplan of the PAQC
• required to be reworked for reconsideration by the PACQ Chair before submission

SELF-ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY

How well has the programme team demonstrated its capability in self-assessment in determining educational performance of the five focus areas.  Use the attached Appendix 2 Rubric 2 to provide a rating?

Excellent/Good/Marginal/Poor  [Choose one]

Explain the reason for this rating referring to the criteria in Rating Rubric.

The rating is given

2.1.2 NZC Study and Career Preparation (Level 3)

2020 Interim PEP NZCSC

ACHIEVEMENT

What area(s) does the programme need to focus on improving in order to improve student achievement in the second half of 2020?

That the PAQC has confidence through its analysis of the PEP that the educational performance ratings given for each focus area (Select one of the following):

• are accurate
• shall be amended for the following focus areas before submission
• required more analysis and are to be reworked for reconsideration

SMART GOALS

What progress does this PEP evidence toward the completion of SMART goals set in the previous PEP? What reasons are known for any delays? Any suggested refinements to the SMART goals for the next period going forward

Progress on previous goals

That the PAQC can confirm that its oversight of the action plans since the last PEP have sighted regular activity toward completion and/or delays where necessary and these (Select one):

• are accurate
• shall be amended as follows before submission
• required more analysis and are to be reworked for reconsideration by the PACQ Chair before submission

New goals set

That the PAQC has reviewed the new SMART goals for this PEP and confirms (Select one):

• they are SMART and will be moved into the global workplan of the PAQC
• shall be amended as follows before moving into the global workplan of the PAQC
• required to be reworked for reconsideration by the PACQ Chair before submission

SELF-ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY

How well has the programme team demonstrated its capability in self-assessment in determining educational performance of the five focus areas.  Use the attached Appendix 2 Rubric 2 to provide a rating?

Excellent/Good/Marginal/Poor  [Choose one]

Explain the reason for this rating referring to the criteria in Rating Rubric.

The rating is given

2.1.3 NZC Study and Career Preparation (Level 4)

2020 Interim PEP NZCSP

ACHIEVEMENT

What area(s) does the programme need to focus on improving in order to improve student achievement in the second half of 2020?

That the PAQC has confidence through its analysis of the PEP that the educational performance ratings given for each focus area (Select one of the following):

• are accurate
• shall be amended for the following focus areas before submission
• required more analysis and are to be reworked for reconsideration

SMART GOALS

What progress does this PEP evidence toward the completion of SMART goals set in the previous PEP? What reasons are known for any delays? Any suggested refinements to the SMART goals for the next period going forward

Progress on previous goals

That the PAQC can confirm that its oversight of the action plans since the last PEP have sighted regular activity toward completion and/or delays where necessary and these (Select one):

• are accurate
• shall be amended as follows before submission
• required more analysis and are to be reworked for reconsideration by the PACQ Chair before submission

New goals set

That the PAQC has reviewed the new SMART goals for this PEP and confirms (Select one):

• they are SMART and will be moved into the global workplan of the PAQC
• shall be amended as follows before moving into the global workplan of the PAQC
• required to be reworked for reconsideration by the PACQ Chair before submission

SELF-ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY

How well has the programme team demonstrated its capability in self-assessment in determining educational performance of the five focus areas.  Use the attached Appendix 2 Rubric 2 to provide a rating?

Excellent/Good/Marginal/Poor  [Choose one]

Explain the reason for this rating referring to the criteria in Rating Rubric.

The rating is given

3. Kupu Whakamutunga | Closing

5.1 Important Dates

• Next meeting:  14-09-2020

5.2 Karakia

Version Tracking

First release:  2020-MM-DD