IntroductionA short course offers learning that is outside of the conventional full programme of study linked to qualifications listed on the New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF). Short Courses are approved by the Academic Approvals Committee. Short courses can can provide an avenue to a greater level of flexibility and faster time to market. They have multiple purposes including:
A short course:
Short courses are self-funded only and do not attract any funding from the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC). If you want your course to be TEC funded, you should be requesting a Training Scheme. Development and approval process Developing a new short course involves working directly with industry and stakeholders to establish the need for the development. You will need to gather evidence to support and submit a business case. Once approval is given, the development process begins: Applying for approval of a Short CourseApplicants are required to complete the Short Course Application which includes:
Course Descriptor provides essential information about this course and information for students. The Course Descriptor includes the following information:
Business Case explains why the short course is needed and how it will be sustained. The Business Case includes the following information:
Te Komiti Whakamana Hotaka Hou | Academic Approvals CommitteeTe Komiti Whakamana Hotaka Hou | Academic Approvals Committee (AAC) ensures that all applications for new or amended programmes that require external approval (e.g. from NZQA) are of the required standard and are aligned with Unitec strategic and quality requirements. This is very detailed quality work. AAC makes recommendations to Academic Board about programme approvals. It meets when required. AAC approves some internal applications such as Short Courses and Training Schemes that do not require NZQA approval. This committee oversees the work of the Programme Improvements Committee. Terms of Reference AAC evaluative approach to approvalThe decision to approve a short course is made by answering the evaluation questions: How well does the development match the intended outcomes and purpose? To what extent does the School have the ongoing capability and resources to support sustained delivery of the approved short course? AAC reviews the information and evidence provided in the application and other information provided to determine if it is sufficient to show how the learners will meet the outcomes. Rubric one (below) sets out the expected levels of performance in relation to the evaluation question for the short course. AAC uses the rubric to reach a decision about approval. Rubric one: Criteria for rating answers to the evaluation questions to approve a short course
Indicative Timelines |
Useful ResourcesTimelinesTimelines for New Programme Development Submissions Final Dates for Programme Development & Improvement Approvals for 2020 Templates/FormsShort Course Application Template Definition of non-standard academic provision Consultation Log Template and Guidance Relevant Policies and ProcedureAC 1.0 Academic Development and Approval Policy AC 1.3 Short Course, Training Scheme, and Vocational Pathway Procedure
|
For assistance with any of the items on this page contact your Te Korowai Kahurangi Administrator or email us at tkk@unitec.ac.nz.